The test grade method is the way that the teacher allows students to demonstrate the mastery of knowledge, training of various capacities tested using a variety of appropriate tools aim pursued. Valuation technique calls the how structured and identifiable as such by the teacher triggers and orients obtaining responses from the subjects, according to the assessment objectives.

Assessment of Schools uses several methods, each assuming multiple techniques. The choice of method depends on the nature school results subject evaluation.

How to calculate oral test grade?

1. Oral test reveals the quality of knowledge, skills and intellectual qualities, ability to apply the knowledge, personality traits as sensitivity to problems, creativity, communication.

Among its advantages can be highlighted: students can be helped by asking questions or additional information, will have the opportunity and immediately correct and complete responses, reverse connection work force is interaction between students, ensure the development of communication skills (expression coherent, reasoned concise own ideas and listening to other interventions).

Students may be asked depending on their real possibilities so as to have their achievements highlighted and eliminated deficiencies. Can make connections with what – said their peers and interdisciplinary connections. This method shy disadvantage students and those with low work rate.

Perform a survey of the contents and the students, time consuming, shows a low validity (not always covered all the essential contents). It is recommended to cover all essential contents, professor adoption by an attitude, open, stimulating development and use of a final grade calculator scheme, rhythm examinations, time needed to develop and complete response.
Oral examination using the following techniques: checking conversation and discussion, interview, description, playing a examination with preparation time gave the response, the list of questions.

The conversation is heavily structured verification and control is held exclusively by the teacher. Its success depends on the nature and sequence questions. We recommend using cognitive questions – productive, granting time required to develop response, examined student involvement in correcting and completing his own answer.
The discussion is less structured, more free, promotes the exchange of views, deepening and broadening the communication act. Students can change the course of the discussion, to ask themselves questions in order to clarify or deepen knowledge.

The interview is more structured than conversation, the teacher wanting to know accurate information about student maintains a firm control over the situation; interview generally involves an introduction through which the favorable climate of communication, a central part that identifies the student’s level of performance and final part designed to confirm or refute the first assessment;

Oral examination with preparation time gave the response is oriented on complex issues which incite reflection, redeploying their knowledge, multidimensional developments.

Playing a content that was previously read or heard the student is one of the most commonly used techniques. It is recommended discouraging students in store and reproduce accurately and stimulating material in my opinions, in identifying possible problems or using specialized languages ​​.
The description can be achieved in the presence of an object or intuitive support or in the absence of any material. Professor choose pupils according to age and educational discipline specific.
Reading dialogues are completed prior shy tries to address students and especially those with a work rate slowed
In oral examination can be used several techniques for the same sample (description of the object or content playback can be followed by conversation or discussion). In developing oral test sets its objectives teacher evaluation, specifies the contents and learning objectives that will be the subject of evaluation, decides techniques, elaborate scheme quotation.

How to calculate test paper grade?

2. Examination written are highlighting the volume and accuracy knowledge, capabilities and intellectual qualities, creativity and capacity resolution. Preferred by shy students and those with intellectual work rate slowed; It offers the possibility of seeing and response review. Through it all pupils are checked for the same content, allowing the teacher to grasp the contents were difficult and that students have trouble learning. Does not let a disadvantage immediate correction of wrong answers that can fix the system so the student’s cognitive and orientation of students through questions and further information. It is made by documentary evidence of current control, works at the end of the chapter, written semester papers (theses) written papers of objective type. All these types of works harness these techniques:
– Short response technique (it is recommended that the question does not include formulations derived directly from manually spaces for answers have equal lengths and be placed in the column to the right questions);
– Technical completion of incomplete utterances (utterances are not derived directly from the manual, and is not excess spaces that will have the same size);
– Choice of dual technology – it requires students to associate The Problems of torque suitable alternative date stated prior statements: give not ever truly false, correctly-incorrectly (The Problems should avoid very general, The Problems of long and complex, ambiguous or irrelevant in terms of education);
– Technical association – students are asked to associate utterances placed on two columns, utterances from the first column is called premises, and the second column answers (it is recommended that the number of responses that are ordered after a criterion logical to some, to be higher than at the premises);
– Technical multiple choice – choice of requesting an answer from a list of alternatives offered for the same utterance that is called premise of alternative distractions and the other one as the answer (it is recommended to be as close response);

The techniques are subjective evaluated complex acquisitions of learning: the ability to identify relationships and ability to develop hypotheses valid, the ability to formulate relevant conclusions, the ability to make predictions about the evolution of processes, the ability to apply new contexts formats knowledge and skills, the ability to make correlations interdisciplinary.

The student has great freedom in selecting, structuring information to elaborate response, exposure in use of knowledge. Subjective techniques raise considerable difficulties in developing correction scheme, the scale of the actual grading and correction. Finals calculator is achieved concise and clear, stating that intellectual operations -the student should appeal. It is very important that correction scheme covering all essential contents. It is recommended indication for guidance range of time available for each item and how to distribute the final grade scoring.